I want to go into this first by saying that I don’t like this situation. At the same time, I have to agree with @longshot405. Alpod is an important member of our community, and I hate that there is something that can make close members of our community leave. But I am sad to see such negativity from a response that everyone was petitioning for. If there is one thing that this world truly lacks, it is the lack of perspective, of being able to put yourself in the shoes of others.
What players know is that A.) Players are becoming unable to play this game and B.) That this started happening when Bandai Namco joined. Putting two and two together, they assumed that Bandai Namco is maliciously ruining Duelyst, and that this is all Bandai Namco’s fault. That’s the easy way out. But like how you must be able to take into account of all plays when making the best move, you must be able to look at all sides of a problem before making the best solution.
The first thing is to look at a business perspective, and ask why would Bandai Namco or CPG would willingly restrict players from playing their game, which would hurt their revenue.
Second, read and reread what was addressed in the answer given by Stormshade, and see how hard it could be for some of those to be the cause for this (especially if you are up-to-date with (American) politics).
Thirdly, look it into the eyes of the community members and moderators. They do care about this situation. @stormshade and @ThanatosNoa both took their time to look at the issue and address it with the community. I have tried to help with communication on this issue ever since it first popped up. If we didn’t care about this issue, then why even bother trying to reach out to the community? Even Stormshade is taking his time to take the heat of this issue, and address the concerns with everyone. Like @seraphicreaper and @longshot405 have said, I respect Stormshade. We are recieving a response, and they are taking responsibility, and that takes a lot of guts.
So please, look at the big picture, and take into account of everything regarding the situation. Stormshade cares about the situation and the community. Thanatos Noa cares about the situation and the community. I care about the situation and the community. I don’t want players to be restricted from playing games. I don’t want there to be legal (or other) reasons to enact such measures. At the same time, I don’t want this world to be stuck in a tunnel on one-perspective. And yea, I think this may just be an optimistic point of view. But who said a pessimistic point of view was right knowing that you don’t know everything about the situation?